Bond, James Bond
As all of you are aware, this past weekend was
Thanksgiving. Everybody has their own
Thanksgiving traditions and my family’s tradition is to see a movie on the
Saturday after. This year was no exception and the movie of choice was Skyfall. All my family members were really looking
forward to seeing the movie given the fact that it had gotten good reviews and
people we knew had really liked the movie.
I think I can speak for all of us when I say the movie did not
disappoint. In fact it exceeded my
expectations and here is why. This is
one of the few James Bond movies that did not depend on gadgets to get James
out of his impossible predicaments. Oh don’t get me wrong I love the James Bond
gadgets. But in this movie it focused on the technology that we have
today. Computer programs, GPS and
tracking devices that are all in use today plus the agent’s ability to think
and assess what to do in a situation made the movie believable. Also Q and Moneypenny are back!
Of course I will not say more because I don’t want to spoil
the movie if you haven’t seen it. It is
definitely something to put on your movie going list.
But that is not why I am writing my post. After the movie was over and all the credits were
rolling I noticed that Ian Fleming was on the list of credits. I was pretty sure Ian Fleming had died but
heck I thought that I could be wrong so I of course went home to Google
him. Just as I suspected he had died in
1962. He wrote many James Bond novels
but Skyfall was not one of them. It
seems he still gets credit because he created and developed the characters or
so it seems to me. So other people wrote
the story and screen play but he still got credit in the movie. Interesting!
Coincidently, I was reading the Sunday Washington Post. I like to read Walter Scott’s Personality
parade the question and answer column on famous people. One of the questions asked by a curious
reader was “There seems to be a new James Patterson novel every month. Does he take part in the writing process or
just lend his name as a co-author?” I was flabbergasted by this question
thinking to myself, why would a writer not write their own books? The answer to this according to Patterson is
that he creates the outline and a “cowriter’ writes the first draft and
Patterson than finishes up. As far as I
am concerned he is not writing or for that matter co-writing these books. He is merely selling his name. Ok he looks at the first draft to make sure
the co-author can write a story but what part of these books did he really
write? He is basically playing the role
of an English professor or a Company with his co-writer being his student or
employee.
How Many other writers are doing this and why? To me writing means expressing your views and
telling your story not letting someone else do it for you. Each writer has their own way of using words
and developing their story. It is like
their finger print and while they may write many novels with different
characters and plots their own special cadence and rhythm is woven into their
words.
When I find an author that I really like, I will usually read
another book by that author. Some of the
things I look for when reading is consistency in the writing. Call me old
fashioned but if I was a successful author why would I let someone else write books under my name causing people
to question my personal writing ability.
Some of my feelings may be my ego talking but I am not so sure. Writing to me is sharing and communicating
with people in my own style. It is an
accomplishment, a personal accomplishment.
Am I the only one out there that feels this way?
Since I am one of your family members I endorse this movie review. Excellent James Bond movie. Nice review Sue Cee! :o)
ReplyDeleteThanks Alray for your great comments
ReplyDelete